Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) vs Traditional Security Brokers

October 01, 2021

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) vs Traditional Security Brokers

When it comes to securing cloud-hosted resources, there are two primary types of security solutions: Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) and traditional security brokers. While both options are designed to keep your resources safe, there are significant differences between them. In this post, we'll take an unbiased look at both options and see how they stack up against each other.

Before we begin, though, let's define what each of these security solutions does.

What Are Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)?

CASBs are cloud-based security solutions that are designed specifically to protect cloud-hosted data and applications. They act as a gatekeeper between the user and the cloud, enforcing security policies and providing visibility into user behavior.

In practical terms, a CASB would sit in front of your cloud environment, acting as a proxy for all inbound and outbound traffic. It would allow your organization to enforce granular security policies, providing visibility into data usage, and preventing unauthorized access.

What Are Traditional Security Brokers?

Traditional security brokers are on-premise solutions that provide security for IT infrastructure. They typically focus on securing devices and networks and are less adept at securing cloud-hosted resources.

In practical terms, traditional security brokers would manage security infrastructure such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and anti-virus software on-premise.

Comparison

Now that we have defined what each security solution does, let's compare them using key security considerations.

Deployment Time

One of the biggest benefits of CASBs over traditional security brokers is that they are quick to deploy. Since they are cloud-based, there is no need for any additional hardware or infrastructure. A CASB can be up and running in a matter of hours, as opposed to traditional security brokers, which can take weeks or even months to implement.

Cost

In general, CASBs are more cost-effective than traditional security brokers in terms of their total cost of ownership. Since they are cloud-based, there is no need to purchase and maintain expensive hardware. Additionally, CASBs tend to be more scalable, allowing for easier adjustments as your organization's needs change.

Flexibility

CASBs also tend to be more flexible than traditional security brokers. They can be connected to any cloud environment, providing a holistic view of all cloud-hosted resources. Traditional security brokers, on the other hand, are typically limited to specific devices and networks.

Security Capabilities

In terms of security capabilities, CASBs offer a range of advanced features that are specifically designed for cloud environments. Some examples include data loss prevention, access control, and cloud audit logging. While traditional security brokers have some security features, they are less advanced and less suited to securing cloud-hosted resources.

Conclusion

While both cloud access security brokers and traditional security brokers provide security for your organization, CASBs are specifically designed for the cloud and offer more advanced security capabilities. Additionally, they are quicker to deploy, more cost-effective, and more flexible.

Keep in mind, though, that not all CASBs are created equal. Some CASBs may lack certain features or not be as effective as others. As with any security solution, it's important to do your research before investing in a CASB.

References


© 2023 Flare Compare